DPP Views — See It Through Their Eyes
The same product passport, six different perspectives. Click a role below to preview what each stakeholder sees.
Live DPP Preview
Data Visibility Overview
Access Matrix
| Data Category | Consumer | Installer | Dismantler | Second-life User | Supplier | Manufacturer | Regulator |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic product info | R | R | R | R | — | R-W | R |
| Technical specifications | — | R | R | R | — | R-W | R |
| Installation data | — | R-W | — | R-W | — | R-W | — |
| Disassembly instructions | — | — | R | R | — | R-W | R |
| Material composition | — | — | R | R | Partial | R-W | R |
| CO2 & environmental | R | R | R | R | — | R-W | R |
| Supplier details | — | — | Partial | — | R-W | R-W | R |
| Certifications | R | R | R | R | Partial | R-W | R |
| Maintenance records | — | R-W | — | R-W | — | R-W | R |
| Pricing & costs | — | — | — | — | — | R-W | — |
| IP-sensitive data | — | — | — | — | — | R-W | R* |
| Audit trail | — | — | — | R | — | R | R |
- Who owns the data in a DPP?
- Where is this data located?
- Who has access to the DPP? Everyone, only customers?
- Do you see differences between contractors and dismantling companies?
- Who gets writing rights / editing rights?
- Can you name information you would not like to share?
- Challenges in automatically linking supplier data to a DPP?
Circular Economy & Business Models
How a Digital Product Passport unlocks new revenue streams and competitive advantage through disassembly, leasing, and tender compliance.
Disassembly Value Chain
Business Model Comparison
Traditional Sale
One-time sale. No lifecycle tracking. Limited DPP benefit beyond basic compliance.
Lease Model
Manufacturer or building owner retains reuse rights. DPP tracks dry mounting, condition, dismantling, and return.
Product-as-a-Service
Full service: installation, maintenance, recycling included. DPP is the contract backbone.
Tender Scoring Impact
Revenue Model Breakdown (Lease + Circular)
IP & Information Tiers
- Are you willing to share how disassembly works?
- Is the manufacturer willing to adopt a different business model (e.g. lease)?
- How important is IP?
- How can a DPP contribute to winning tenders? What information is needed?
Product Lifecycle & Disassembly
Every stage documented, every component tracked — from factory floor to material recovery.
Lifecycle Timeline
Disassembly Guide
Tools: Inspection light, moisture meter, utility knife
Safety: Check whether wet-area joints were glued with FAAYFIX before attempting reuse
Output: Reuse eligibility recorded before dismantling starts
Tools: Pry tool, screw gun, panel supports
Fasteners: Tongue-and-groove joints or steel T-profiles, depending on installation
Output: Panel edges checked for damage and logged in the DPP
Tools: Two-person lift, panel trolley, protective edge strips
Note: VP35 is 600 mm wide and available in heights from 2400 to 3600 mm
Output: Flax-core panel retained as a whole reusable building element
Tools: Screwdriver, pliers, cable detector
Components: Steel T-profiles, service-cavity cabling, local finish accessories
Output: Reusable profiles separated; any service penetrations documented
Action: Sort materials by type, update DPP with recovery record
Output: Material recovery certificate generated in DPP
Total estimated time: 70 minutes for inspection, removal, and DPP update per panel bay
Document Library
Cumulative Cost Tracking
Data Cost Analysis
| Item | One-time | Recurring |
|---|---|---|
| Document digitization | €12,000 | — |
| DPP platform setup | €3,000 | — |
| Per-product DPP creation | — | €2.50/unit |
| Annual platform maintenance | — | €3,000/year |
| Staff training | €2,000 | — |
- Information about disassembly is important for the life cycle. Is the manufacturer willing to provide all documents in a DPP?
- What about data costs?
Materials & Supply Chain
Full material transparency — origin, composition, environmental impact, and supplier traceability.
Material Composition
Supply Chain Flow
CO2 Impact by Material
Bill of Materials
| Component | Material | Origin | Supplier | Certifications | CO2e (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biogenics | Flax and cardboard | Netherlands / nearby flax region | Regional flax/cardboard supply | FAAY composition | ~55% |
| Minerals | Gypsum | EU | Gypsum supply | FAAY composition | ~43% |
| Plastics | Glue-led plastics fraction | EU | Glue/plastics supply | FAAY composition | ~1.3% |
| Glue share | Glue is nearly all of the plastics category | EU | Glue/plastics supply | FAAY composition | ~all plastics |
| Other / rounding | Minor residual fraction | EU | Multiple | Calculated remainder | <1% |
| Panel weight | VP35 reference weight | Netherlands | FAAY Vianen B.V. | Product property | ~23 kg/m2 |
| Reuse condition | Dry-mounted walls remain demountable; glued wet-area joints prevent reuse | Netherlands | Installer / FAAY | Installation record | DPP check |
| Acoustic performance | Slim facing wall for acoustic improvement | Netherlands | FAAY Vianen B.V. | VP35 specification | 10-20 dB |
| Material composition total | ~100% | ||||
Supplier Readiness
Current vs. Desired State
Current State
- Supplier data in Excel spreadsheets
- Manual data entry from purchase orders
- No standardized format across suppliers
- CO2 data for ~40% of components (estimated)
- Certification tracking is manual
Desired State
- Standardized digital format (ILCD/OpenEPD)
- Automated DPP ingestion
- 100% certification tracking with alerts
- Real-time CO2 from verified supplier data
- API-based supplier integration
- Is the manufacturer willing to share the origin of all parts, compositions, CO2 impact, and suppliers?
- How is supplier data currently recorded? What is desirable?
Data Governance & Access
Who owns it, who sees it, who controls it — the information architecture behind a Digital Product Passport.
Data Ownership Model
Manufacturer (FAAY)
Owns product specs, manufacturing data, disassembly instructions
Suppliers
Own material composition, CO2 data, certifications
Platform Provider
Owns infrastructure, access logs, encryption
Regulator / Auditor
Owns verification records, compliance status
Access Heatmap
Data Flow Architecture
Privacy & Sensitive Data
Integration Challenges
Data Format Diversity
Suppliers use PDF, Excel, proprietary ERP exports, APIs. Normalizing this is the #1 technical challenge.
Supplier Readiness
Not all suppliers have digital capabilities. Some still rely on paper certificates and phone calls.
System Integration
Connecting existing ERP/MRP systems to the DPP platform requires custom APIs or middleware.
- Who owns the data in a DPP? Where is it located?
- Who has access? Everyone, only customers?
- Differences between contractors and dismantling companies?
- Who gets writing/editing rights?
- What data would you NOT share?
- Challenges in automatically linking supplier data?
Value Retention & Residual Value
For a demountable FAAY Volpaneel 35, residual value depends on whether reuse is physically possible and whether the next buyer can trust the product history.
Illustrative Residual Value by Reuse Cycle
Residual Value Guarantee Mechanisms
Condition Monitoring
Each removal and reinstallation logs panel condition, edge damage, moisture exposure, and suitability for the next use.
Mounting Method
Dry mounting keeps the panel reusable; glued joints or wet-area finishing lower the residual-value index.
Certified Reassembly
Installers and dismantlers record whether the tongue-and-groove edges and plasterboard faces remain fit for reuse.
Material Certification
The DPP records the flax-shive core, plasterboard faces, dimensions, acoustic rating, and applicable declarations.
Chain of Custody
Every transfer from manufacture to recovery recorded. No gaps in product history.
Mock DPP Value Record
ASSEMBLY HISTORY
| 15-03-2026 | Dry-mounted installation | Reusable |
| (next event) | Removal inspection | — |
| (each reuse) | Reassembly validation | — |
CONDITION ASSESSMENT
PROJECTED VALUE INDEX
| Reuse cycle 1 | ~90 | condition proven |
| Reuse cycle 3 | ~70 | condition proven |
| Reuse cycle 5 | ~50 | condition proven |
| Reuse cycle 7 | ~40 | condition proven |
VALUE EVIDENCE
| Dry-mounted history | Verified |
| 35 mm VP35 specification | Verified |
| Flax-shive core + plasterboard faces | Verified |
| Acoustic improvement 10-20 dB | Verified |
| Circular only at cycle 7 | ~10 |
| Circular + DPP at cycle 7 | ~40 |
Scenario Comparison
- As a producer, how can you guarantee the residual value of a product?
- Would you like to record that in a DPP?
Data Automation & Integration
Bridging the gap between existing systems and the DPP — a phased approach to automation.
Data Source Readiness
Data Sources
Automation Pipeline
Integration Methods
API Integration
Real-time or near-real-time data sync. Best for ERP, QMS, supplier portals.
File Import (Batch)
Scheduled uploads of structured files. Best for supplier data, certificates, batch updates.
Manual Entry (Fallback)
Web form entry into DPP platform. Best for one-offs, legacy data, edge cases.
Implementation Roadmap
Investment Estimate
| Item | Cost |
|---|---|
| Platform license | €15K–25K/year |
| Implementation | €30K–50K one-time |
| Ongoing operations | €10K–15K/year |
| Total first year | €45K–75K |
- How would you like to get the existing product and material data into a DPP?